Will do, but I for one welcome our new benevolent robot overlords.....
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1) Looking forward to it, 2) You no longer need bit.lys in tweets, and 3) Can we do an interview about AI for
@PCMag ? -
Hopefully you balance it with counter arguments from an AI expert.
-
Any you would recommend?
-
Stuart Russell https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~russell/ is an AI researcher - he thinks concern about AI risk's a 'thing'
-
He's also in a minority and is why he seems to always be the example
-
Yeah and any appeal to opinipns of scientists needs to appeal to consensus to be valid.
-
s/ ? Clearly false. Validity of opinion depends on evidence and reasons on which it's based
-
What's false? That appeal to scientific consensus is valid and valuable? Not controversial.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I was genuinely shocked by Neil deGrasse Tyson’s “laissez-faire” attitude to this subject, when discussed with you.
-
The "pull the plug" line by NDT especially
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I will watch it later
@SamHarrisOrg@caspmax but I will be disappointed if I see the usual scaremongering. Care makes sense. Fear does not.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
AI is an out of control train we have no control over. Even narrow AI will take a lot of jobs. It's doing that now.
-
Huge amaounts of jobs are about to be automated this decade. (drivers, analysts etc) The future is now. General AI in 12 years
-
Relying on automation like spell checkers for example is degrading my natural abilities. Change is happening now. Not in 50 y
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Some big silicon valley companies (Google, Microsoft, Facebook) created a partnership to discuss this: http://www.partnershiponai.org/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your talk is thought provoking, but I'm wondering how Ray Kurzweil and his Singularity hypothesis could offset the risk.
-
Ray Kurzweil is dead wrong about pace of progress towards singularity vs superintelligent machines
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Good talk. 14 minutes simply isn't enough time to be sufficiently persuasive to anyone who's new to the subject, though.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.