@SamHarrisOrg Hi Sam, I have re-listened to the audio and you're right. I've emailed Counterpunch to let them know. Honest mistake.
-
-
-
@MarekSullivan@SamHarrisOrg Excellent because reasonable concerns are sometimes voiced by people who are very unreasonable in other ways. -
@HPluckrose@SamHarrisOrg yep, and we'd be sympathetic to those concerns. But apparently Harris isn't, hence a contradiction. -
@MarekSullivan@SamHarrisOrg I don't know what you mean? He said an unreasonable person voiced a reasonable concern that he shared, no? -
@HPluckrose@SamHarrisOrg Yes, but also said he had 'no sympathy at all for Ted Cruz's politics' > contradiction. It's basic, really. -
@MarekSullivan@SamHarrisOrg I see. So anyone who has concerns abt harm motivated by Islam must share Cruz's politics to some degree? -
.
@MarekSullivan@SamHarrisOrg I don't know US politics very well.In UK, concern abt Religious Right in form of Islam shld be concern of Left
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg Update: the mistake is going to be fixed. Sorry about the confusion. -
@MarekSullivan@SamHarrisOrg But "the mistake" was the heart of your article, which will still be wrong. -
@fredescristobal@SamHarrisOrg I don't think so. But you'll be the judge of that. -
@MarekSullivan@fredescristobal@SamHarrisOrg love your cheap attack by likening Harris to Trump - that certainly showed your non-bias
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg Btw I originally wrote 'reasonable, concerned voice', not 'reasoned'. Just a detail, but your version = much more deliberate. -
@MarekSullivan@SamHarrisOrg The follow up defending "Xtian Only" refugee selection more disturbing. 'concern to voice"? yes. Reasonable?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.