Remarkable how you resort to name calling when presented with facts that don't conform to your dogma.https://twitter.com/SamHarrisOrg/status/673942533018267648 …
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg Any one can say they have the 'traffic'; they want more. And seeing how you abused@DMogahed, don't blame her if she declined. -
@manfromatlan@SamHarrisOrg@DMogahed she said the paris attacks were not religious. That's pretty dishonest. -
@BigManTomBomb She said they weren't 'religious' (what with the drinking, whoring, drug taking) or did you miss that? -
@manfromatlan not everything a Muslim does is linked to scripture. But the attacks obviously were.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@manfromatlan@DMogahed "abused" and "name-calling"? Do either of you know what these words even mean? -
@manfromatlan The most aggressive (and true) words were "politically insidious and morally offensive." Tell me how that's not fair game. -
@dg_chicago That was his opinion, asserted as fact. And unlike you, I drilled down to the originating comment. -
@manfromatlan@dg_chicago Of course its his opinion, who else's would it be? you haven't demonstrated its "abuse" or "name calling" -
@jpmoneypants@dg_chicago I suggested you drill down to his opening remarks. Already provided link once, sorry. -
@manfromatlan@jpmoneypants redirection, dodge tactics, and non-sequiturs: what some people mistake for "drilling-down" to good analysis.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@manfromatlan@DMogahed do you think I have control of my mindThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.