"It's close" is debatable (5 years or 50?), but this article doesn't address the danger at all.https://twitter.com/ToKTeacher/status/602260717522194433 …
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@Atticus_Amber@ToKTeacher In sum, my ideas on this a bit half-baked, but seems reasonable that AGI may be inherently ethical. -
.
@OneHipNinja Agreed. And I think arguments in "The Moral Landscape" by@SamHarrisOrg are actually a refutation of his own position on AGI. -
@OneHipNinja@SamHarrisOrg And, once programmed, won't think about them and improve on them. As tho objective progress is impossible.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@Atticus_Amber@ToKTeacher If ethics are real, and necessitated by reason, why shouldn't AGI discover/possess them? -
@OneHipNinja@SamHarrisOrg@Atticus_Amber Of course they would. That is *exactly* the point. To treat them like ISIS *at birth* is terrible - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@Atticus_Amber@ToKTeacher If conscious experience has intrinsic value, that's all AGI would have to know to value us. -
Tweet unavailable
-
@Atticus_Amber@SamHarrisOrg@ToKTeacher Not if ethics are real, and advance alongside reasoning capacity.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@Atticus_Amber@ToKTeacher ... And available to discovery and adoption by AGI as being as true as said math/logic/reason, etc.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@Atticus_Amber@ToKTeacher I guess the pivotal issue is whether ethical reasoning, like math, would be real...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Atticus_Amber@SamHarrisOrg@ToKTeacher we got our prejudices from millions of years of evolution. Where's agi gonna get theirs?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.