@SamHarrisOrg In your reply to Chomsky you argue that intentions matter. I agree. How do you square this with the consequentionalism of TML?
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg I guess my question to you is whether, in your view, the only value of discussing intentions are the consequences thereof? (2) -
@SamHarrisOrg I'm still not even sure I've nailed down my question. IRL, this is a 2 min discussion. On twitter, it's a giant hassle! haha.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg Absolutely agree. And thank you for responding! (And as I'm sure u know, I come to this discussion w/ TOTAL humility).haha (1)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@DonRyanMusic If Chomsky, et al, are naive about enemies (probably), possible you're naive about us (our intentions)? Thx Sam. -
@OneHipNinja@SamHarrisOrg@DonRyanMusic our intentions are certainly selfish, but not sadistic.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@DonRyanMusic Do you tend to suppose that frequent INTENT of US is not neocolonial and exploitative, on balance historically? -
@OneHipNinja@SamHarrisOrg Considering the fact that the U.S is a constantly shifting, ever-evolving democracy, this doesn't make sense. -
@Ameriman1984@SamHarrisOrg No. It most certainly is not. And post-WW2 foreign policy has had largely the same aims irrespective of party. -
@OneHipNinja@SamHarrisOrg Okay, I see the claim, but no support for it...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.