My thoughts on @SamHarrisOrg and killing people for their beliefs (no I don’t call him a genocidal fascist maniac)http://philosopherinthemirror.wordpress.com/2014/10/22/beyond-belief-on-the-ethics-of-killing/ …
-
-
.
@SamHarrisOrg Fair enough! And look at us talking and not calling each other names - perhaps conversations *are* possible after all :-)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@MultipleDraftz at times it seems like you were disregarding the words "some" and "may" in the original quote. -
@goosegill How does the "some" and "may" help? If you said there was just *one* Belief X that you *may* kill someone for, I'd disagree [1/2] -
@goosegill I fear Twitter not the best place to get into a debate about this complex issue; feel free to leave comments on the blog! [2/2] -
@MultipleDraftz ok! Good piece overall though, I thought. -
@goosegill Thanks! At least we've kept it a bit more civil than a lot of debates about Harris's work, eh? Pats on the back all round :-) -
@MultipleDraftz yes b/c at least you acknowledge that maybe he was being obtuse! I disagree, but that's a step up
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@MultipleDraftz I assume that a truly dangerous belief implies the means, intent and likelihood that it will be acted on.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg That's what I've always suspected.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.