Writer X spreads malicious lies about writer Y. Y accurately describes X as “a liar.” This is not an “ad hominem” argument.
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg "ad hominem .. not always fallacious .. questions of character, motives R relevant 2 issue" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem#Types_of_ad_hominem_reasoning …@SIN_NotungThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@SIN_Notung Writer Y claims: I was quoted out of context. This is a lie. -> Writer Y is a lying sack of shit.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg Sure, I agree with you there.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.