I wonder, is it best, @SamHarrisOrg, to just ignore the Outrage Junkies & Offence Junkies? Don't feed their craving?http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/im-not-the-sexist-pig-youre-looking-for …
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@RichardDawkins No - because it's not them you're trying to convince. It's the "swinging voters" who might be swayed by them. -
.
@joshuapaling@SamHarrisOrg Yes, that's the opposite argument I often put myself (eg whether to debate creationists). I can't decide. -
Tweet unavailable
-
@Hedge76 Maybe the very small fraction of women who DON'T abort them? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@RichardDawkins Just tweeted your new article Sam. Sorry you actually had to write it. Can't understand the complaints of some -
@carolynporco@RichardDawkins It really is amazing to try to reason with these people. They think they know your mind better than you do. -
@SamHarrisOrg@RichardDawkins Social media is serving as the great amplifier of little things. A non-linearity generator. Breathe deeply... - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@RichardDawkins These "feminists" are concerned with online social brownie points, clearly not the empowerment of women. -
@CompleteCulture@SamHarrisOrg@RichardDawkins Facebook status: ooh look at me, I'm debating Sam Harris on Twitter. SMH -
@ungodlynews@SamHarrisOrg@RichardDawkins Imagine that. *sigh*
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg They deserve no more attention than a crazy drunk in the park talking to the ducks@RichardDawkins - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg And if you can't ignore them, ridicule them. Relentlessly. Mercilessly. NEVER take them seriously.@RichardDawkins - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.