@SamHarrisOrg @drzach You should definitely write a rebuttal and challenge Plantinga on logic and philosophy. Surely you would win.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg Blimey! Certainly seems a pretty spurious argument about the mutual exclusivity of evolution and materialism.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg Which truth is stronger; the irrefutable fact or the unshakable faith? He confuses rationalization with rationality. Garbage.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg any response planned?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg See "Believing Bullshit" by Stephen Law, Plantinga's arguments are almost verbatim to the examples of BS given in the book.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg How is "lack of evidence not enough" for atheism?!? Isn't that precisely what atheism is? How deluded is Plantinga?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg Is the myers briggs test valid? Does it have any merit?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg It's mind-blowing how full of shit Plantinga is. 100% sophistry.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg very odd, the even number of stars analogy??? Sloppy reasoning!!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg This is the sort of nonsense one might hear from a budding freshman philosophy student, not an emeritus professorThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@philosophybites "If a belief is as likely to be false as to be true ..."@ShitPhilosophrs say.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg The 'stars' argument would be comparable, if one side said there were invisible stars, and the other side said 'Prove it'.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@philosophybites Assumption that it is possible for differing beliefs to have identical neurophys. properties v weak.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@philosophybites Man with abduction hammer sees many nails.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg I enjoy the analysis and debate when focused on the question ... not when tilted towards name-calling in an effort to "win".Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg Therefore if Plantinga's argument makes a skerrick of sense then there is no God.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.