@craig_mcfarlane You appear to be confused.
-
-
Replying to @SamHarrisOrg
@SamHarrisOrg@craig_mcfarlane You're saying ~V -> ~C, ~C -> ~N, ergo N -> V. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @antheologian
@antheologian@craig_mcfarlane I'm really saying No Consciousness -> No Values.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SamHarrisOrg
@SamHarrisOrg@craig_mcfarlane "values depend on consciousness" is not the same as "consciousness causes values".1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @antheologian
@antheologian@SamHarrisOrg@craig_mcfarlane "consciousness causes values" is not the same as "no consciousness -> no values"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ScienceDogood
@blindkittykat
@SamHarrisOrg@craig_mcfarlane but "values depends on consciousness" is equivalent to it. And that's my exact point.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @antheologian
@antheologian my point was that you're exact point is a false equivalency.. Which Sam just showed you.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ScienceDogood
Christopher Roussel Retweeted Sam Harris
@blindkittykat
@SamHarrisOrg That contradiction suggests that statements https://twitter.com/SamHarrisOrg/status/374334507890913282 … and https://twitter.com/SamHarrisOrg/status/374406420994596865 … are different.Christopher Roussel added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @antheologian
@antheologian @blindkittykat My claim is that the only thing we (or anyone) can value are actual (or potential) states of C.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SamHarrisOrg
@SamHarrisOrg, It appears@antheologian thinks the word "causes" and "depends" are synonymous here2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@blindkittykat @antheologian Is that the problem? It's hard to figure out how we are talking past each other in 140 characters.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.