@SamHarrisOrg @craig_mcfarlane You're saying ~V -> ~C, ~C -> ~N, ergo N -> V. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent …
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@antheologian@Ameriman1984 It's unavoidable, isn't it?, if you police your critics's discourse and limit them to 1000 words? -
@craig_mcfarlane@antheologian@Ameriman1984 1000 words should suffice to get the conversation started. Then we'll see where it goes. -
@SamHarrisOrg@antheologian@Ameriman1984 Point is, if you can't reduce your argument to a coherent soundbite what chance have your critics? -
@craig_mcfarlane@SamHarrisOrg@antheologian 1,000 words is hardly a soundbite. Imagine how many of these he'll be reading...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@Ameriman1984@craig_mcfarlane Then you're not making a logical argument.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.