@SamHarrisOrg Ha! You know, it was actually a link to wrong part of debate. I meant http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryQCoWXCnCQ … - will get it changed.
-
-
-
.
@oliverburkeman Your remedy is to change the link? Amazing... Why not understand my actual definition of "science"? -
@SamHarrisOrg Well, obviously, I don't expect you to agree with me that your argument is deeply flawed! -
@oliverburkeman And there is no "derision" at that point in the debate either. I greatly respect P.Singer. You are being quite misleading.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@oliverburkeman People see what they want to see and not what's there, I suppose.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg Interesting how critics sidestep analogy to sci of medicine and its founding premise that healthy=good, incl.@oliverburkemanThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg would love to get your thoughts on this. Inspired by many of your talks: My path to Secular Humanism. http://wp.me/p3C2e5-4lThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.