@robbensinger I'm not challenging your arguments in the piece. I agree with them. Just bringing up a related point.
-
-
Replying to @Intrinsic29
.
@Intrinsic29 Do feel free to challenge my arguments, if you find any problems with them.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @robbensinger
@robbensinger I wouldn't hesitate if I did. :p I am curious what you thought of the Craig and Harris debate.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Intrinsic29
.
@Intrinsic29 Craig won that debate. Harris didn't address Craig's main arguments, or even clearly explain why they warranted no reply.8 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robbensinger
@robbensinger I'm not sure I agree but also,@SamHarrisOrg made arguments of his own too. Do you think Craig sufficiently refuted them?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Intrinsic29
@Intrinsic29@SamHarrisOrg I agree Craig's debate set-ups are very dishonest. He wouldn't tell Rosenberg the topic in advance either.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @SamHarrisOrg
@SamHarrisOrg@robbensinger@Intrinsic29 The idea of a world in which psychopaths occupy peaks on the moral landscape is very troubling.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Ameriman1984
@Ameriman1984@robbensinger@Intrinsic29 Not a realistic concern. You'd have to change too many things -- the world would unrecognizable.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SamHarrisOrg
@SamHarrisOrg@Ameriman1984 Psychopaths occupying peaks is okay—even good. What isn't okay is a peak for them at other's expense3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
@jmacglashan @Ameriman1984 Yes--because then it couldn't be a peak.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.