@danarel @opusatrum @michaelshermer @SamHarrisOrg @Salon
Hitchens would find lame a "defence" that fails to answer specifics of article.
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg@oforero@michaelshermer@Salon The whole NewAtheist project is highly polemical; I don't see Y polemical push-back unethical -
@DougJanack@oforero@michaelshermer@Salon You really don't see how making false claims about your opponent's views is unethical? -
@SamHarrisOrg@oforero@michaelshermer@Salon Which specific claims were false? Article accurately characterized Hitchens' take on religion -
@DougJanack For starters... "Nor did [Hitch] take the trouble to learn about about... Stephen Batchelor.":http://bit.ly/a3u1BK -
@SamHarrisOrg Thanks. See, that refutes one specific point in the article. Clearly Hitchens take on Buddhism evolved. -
@DougJanack@SamHarrisOrg or maybe Buddhism evolved? -
@oforero@SamHarrisOrg That's true too, just all ALL religions evolve. So, one should avoid oversimplifying to score polemical points - 19 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.