Interesting but not sure I agree with @SamHarrisOrg's premise. All religiosity sounds like nonsense to me but... @SaifRRahman @JPSargeant78
@fodwyer @JPSargeant78 Cute, but that doesn't cut it. We're not talking formal logic. And for long stretches, there are no contradictions.
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg so you require a ‘theological’ argument that doesn’t need to meet standards of logic (like they ever do). Ask me a hard one. -
@fodwyer I don't require it. Moderates require it so that they can make a plausible case for their "interpretation" of the faith. -
@SamHarrisOrg What’s plausible depends on who you ask, and I think you’ll find that that the religious can plause pretty much anything. -
@fodwyer Not true. You can't a get a version of Christianity that says, "Jesus was an average schmuck who had no connection to God." -
@SamHarrisOrg Sure you could and probably could get a Ph.D in theology for it too (esp. if you also argued that its negation was true too).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.