If the risk of nuclear terrorism were 50% over the next decade. What freedom would you sacrifice to diminish it to 5%?
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg Waging an aggressive war is never "right." It's one of the definitional crimes against humanity. -
@jcape@SamHarrisOrg those who directed the landing in Normandy would beg to differ -
@millertime32@SamHarrisOrg 1. [citation needed] 2. Their opinion < Nuremberg jurists' opinion. -
@jcape@SamHarrisOrg you don't need a citation. They showed it by their actions.#WWII#KoreanWar etc... -
@millertime32@SamHarrisOrg "Waging aggressive war" has a specific legal definition. The U.S. was not the aggressor in either WW2 or Korea. -
@jcape@SamHarrisOrg The problem is in the interpretation of "aggressive war". With nuclear proliferation it's can vary. -
@millertime32@SamHarrisOrg That is silly. The UN exists specifically to arbitrate those issues, as it did in Korea and Kuwait. -
@jcape@SamHarrisOrg The same UN who places Iran on the Human Rights committee. Now that is silly - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.