I've been telling you to get this guy on the podcast for years. You have a lot to discuss. Even if it's just him talking about how cold reading works--known tricks--it would be fascinating.
-
-
-
It will happen.
-
You also need to get Tim Urban on
@waitbutwhy
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
would love to hear
@DerrenBrown on waking up and also@joeroganThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I need a
@DerrenBrown and@SamHarrisOrg podcast in life! My two fav people
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
'Debate' used to mean differing viewpoints, not two misogynistic, islamophobic right wing nutters and a third person no-one's heard of
-
How clichéd... Were you there?
-
Very familiar with both Murray and Peterson's work - have read extensively and also listened.
-
So, Sam would be the one no-one’s heard of? ^^
-
No disrespect to him (nor is any intended) but he would not be known in this country.
-
I see.. it’s just a little weird to me but ok. Like, for example, I live in sicily, was born here, and I’ve known sam’s work even before getting to know peterson and murray.. but they’re all famous all over the world...
-
Put that down to my ignorance so. I'll look up his work. Thanks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sam,
@DerrenBrown would be a great podcast guest. You’d love the themes in his book ‘Happy’ and his work in debunking faith healers.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I love
@DerrenBrown! I agree with others: have him on the podcast, Sam!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
PODCAST!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Next guest for the podcast, surely !
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He called 3 sanctimonious pricks who agree about everything but "god" a debate? Please. These people are sycophants. You're L Ron Hubbard for the Actually Guy. Peterson is L Ron Hubbard for Men's Rights Activists.
-
How can they be sanctimonious? That suggests they think they are morally superior to anyone else. When the origin of morality is one of the things they are discussing, to find a consensus on its origin and meaning. How many beers have you actually had?
-
They do. And they think they are all intellectually superior to everyone else. And the fans are fucking sycophants. It's ridiculous to watch this shit unfold. Keep doing what you do though. Lots of sad men need heroes to worship. :)
-
You do realize that resorting to ad hominem, weakens your position and opinion, not bolster it? You’re asserting what you think someone else “thinks”. Do you regularly find yourself resorting to presumption and verbal abuse when you can’t articulate your point well?
-
In did in fact comment upon the character of a person. Nothing gets by you.
-
You see, I never agreed to a discussion on your terms. You can try to police my tone, but it won't work because you aren't in a position to do so. You'll probably end up blocking me eventually for not following your little rules for tweeting back and forth.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.