Did you read the article? Crime rate in SF is actually down. You just FEEL unsafe. Probably due to too much time spent on Nextdoor or the like.
-
-
Replying to @elinalynne @SafewordCapital and
my understanding is that the he's essentially cooking the books, as in: the crimes are being underreported and recategorized. i could be wrong
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mentju4 @elinalynne and
but even then, commonsense tells you: incentivizing crime is probably not the best strategy in obviously volatile times. my car was stolen twice and broken into on two *separate* occasions. haven't been there in a year, but hear wildly disparate points of view.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mentju4 @SafewordCapital and
Ah - now we're getting somewhere. You have a taste for retaliation. Incarceration doesn't really work, but it makes people feel a little better.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @elinalynne @SafewordCapital and
incarceration doesn't really work? well whatever this alternative is appears to be working a lot less than incarceration. it seems you are looking for solutions in a world without constraints. i tend to look for trade-offs in a world with constraints.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mentju4 @SafewordCapital and
You know, that is covered so well in the article Boudin posted. You should really read it. When I care about an issue, I go to the trouble of actually learning about it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @elinalynne @SafewordCapital and
wait, you don't have the upper hand here at all, you dodged my points.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mentju4 @SafewordCapital and
3 points you have made: - Unsubstantiated accusation of "cooking the books" - Claim that Boudin is "incentivizing crime" by reducing incarceration while ignoring economic factors other city depts.' lack of action - I'm mad my car got stolen (not really a point per se)
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @elinalynne @mentju4 and
The only thing that’s unsubstantiated is whether the reduction in violent crime is due to Chesa’s policies. You have absolutely no data points to support that. None. And you haven’t even attempted to address the rebuttals in this thread.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SafewordCapital @mentju4 and
But the reverse it true too. You have no data Chesa’s policies drove an increase in burglary. You have absolutely no data points to support that. None. And you haven’t even attempted to address the rebuttals in this thread.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
You are correct. Fortunately there is data omitted from the articles posted supporting the notion that 40% of the people arrested for crimes were repeat offenders. Chesa lets ppl walk, and they commit crimes again. If there isn’t a deterrent, people will continue to commit crimes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.