Other studies disagree. Really a single counter example is needed, and there are many men who say it's less sensation. What makes more logically sense? Cutting off 10k-20k nerve endings, destroying the mucluos membrane and gliding function decreases sexual pleasure, or not?
-
-
Many adults say that circumcision is somehow harmful and makes males lose functions, we call them ignorant.
-
It is harmful in the way the newborn has no say and it is unethical in that sense.
-
Newborn also have no say in vaccination or anything for that matter. Are yoh really arguing for child consent, when all babies/kids have their lives decided by someone else.
-
Tell me how vaccination, which is mostly recommended by all doctors, is similar to circumcision which removes permanently a part of the body.
-
Because if child consent is your actual argument, then vaccination would be bad. But a child consent have no bearings after all.
-
Again, tell me how similar both situations really are. Did I say that consent should be acquired for every decisions a parent makes ? No, of course not, we're talking about circumcision specifically.
-
Circumcision risks are very low, with high benefits. Change nothing of tbe sex lives for the males, loses no function, and a safe procedure. So I see no problem in circumcision.
-
High benefits ? If the benefits were as high, doctors would recommend it as much as vaccines but oh wait, they actually don't recommend circumcision as a medically worthy procedure.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.