Ranked Choice Vote insights on the @chesaboudin race results from last year. Attn @progressnerd @sftenan #SanFrancisco #sfelectionspic.twitter.com/OA9rIK8GGj
2/3 voted moderate and 1/3 voted progressive and there were 3 moderates and 1 progressive. The math doesn’t work for the moderates under this electorate. The moderates diluted themselves allowing Chesa to win. And here we are under the microscope of a social experiment.
-
-
And over 12k failed to cast a vote in this race at all
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What is your theory as to why 18,000 voters ranked Tung or Dautch first and Boudin second? Have you spoken with any of them? Do they disagree with your moderate/progressive categorization or were they voting on dimensions different from ideology?
-
First choice totals: Loftus 31%, Leif 14%, Tung 19%, Boudin 36%. So 64% Moderate, 35% progressive. If that’s not a guide for a failed model, you are kidding yourself.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.