I'm actually for restorative justice, believe it or not, but restorative justice THAT WORKS and is also rehabilitative. I'm also into justice for the victims. What we have now is a watered-down, bastardized version of RJ that is neither restorative, rehabilitative, nor just.
-
-
Replying to @StephenMPinto
@StephenMPinto , The@SF_DPH , has instructed@chesaboudin to release another 27% of those incarcerated in response to pandemic. 235/835 for a maximum of 600 held, if you disagree with how Chesa is doing so now, how would you address their release?pic.twitter.com/e13dnFnTES
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @netfire4 @StephenMPinto and
@SF_DPH doesn't actually have the authority to instruct@chesaboudin to do anything. Reducing the prison population shouldn't be done at the expense of the safety of law-abiding citizens. Violent criminals should not be released just to hit an arbitrary number.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SF_Shoobie @StephenMPinto and
And we shouldn't have 5% of the population and 25% of the prisoners. Yet hear we are, and maybe that arbitrary line isn't perfect but what we've been doing is far from it.pic.twitter.com/ad9BPbn8DD
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @netfire4 @StephenMPinto and
Here are the facts: 1) A known violent criminal was released arbitrarily by Chesa's office to hit a quota. 2) That felon robbed a presumably already struggling business and killed 2 innocent citizens while fleeing. Who is at fault here - Chesa or DPH? We are owed accountability.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
We have said for months now that releasing known violent criminals will endanger the public. Now 2 women are dead. Reducing our prisoner population shouldn't be done at the expense of public safety. Period. Yes, even to solve your "existential threat" talking point.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.