I would create a baseline as to what would make an inmate a safe bet to release into society - then review the cases that aligned with this baseline. I wouldn't get caught up hitting the number "235", but rather review only those cases deemed safe to get as close as possible.
-
-
Replying to @SF_Shoobie @michelletandler and
its uncomfortable like the rest of pandemic but that doesn't answer the question. Ok, but the doctors, are telling
@chesaboudin that for our city to hold any more than 600 people is unsafe and will lead to a great risk of society wide corona infection. Which ones would you hold?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @netfire4 @michelletandler and
600 isn't an absolute line - it's not as though the number 600 magically represents safety. We should try to get as close to 600 as possible but our community is already dealing with COVID we shouldn't add inmates we don't have a baseline level of confidence can follow the law.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SF_Shoobie @michelletandler and
You're right, we would be safer if it was even lower, 600 represents the ceiling and we need to release many more than the 235 we are discussing. However, in this land of mass incarceration, no one follows the law.https://ips-dc.org/three-felonies-day/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @netfire4 @michelletandler and
In this land the vast majority of us are able to live our lives without inhibiting happiness and success of our community. Happy to go lower than 600 if so many inmates are able to meet the aforementioned bar of confidence for parole and will be sent back to prison if they don't.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SF_Shoobie @michelletandler and
That wasn't the question, how might you prioritize releasing the remaining 28% of 835? Given that we may following medical guidance hold only 600, & there are many more that you regularly complain need incarcerated failing your standard of complying w incoherent excessive law.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @netfire4 @michelletandler and
I answered the question - 600 is a guideline estimate. We get as close as we can while remaining confident that those paroled won't negatively impact the [already struggling] community I also don't advocate for incarceration - status quo is unacceptable but I'm open to solutions
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SF_Shoobie @michelletandler and
Paul Retweeted Paul
So I was asking, how would you prioritize the release of the additional 235, and you answered more people should be incarcerated than we have currently, how is that answering the question?https://twitter.com/netfire4/status/1341089659120545792 …
Paul added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @netfire4 @michelletandler and
I think our communication is mixed up here. My point was to not get caught up on finding 235 inmates to parole, but rather form a baseline of confidence to apply to each inmate and parole as many as meet that bar while keeping confidence that this won't negatively impact society
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SF_Shoobie @michelletandler and
As I initially said, I know you want more incarceration, but i was asking you to make the difficult choice that
@chesaboudin is faced with if he respects our@SF_DPH . So again, how would you prioritize which additional 235 you release?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Lol I have explained a couple times how I would prioritize prisoners for parole. If I were @chesaboudin, I wouldn't be caught up on reaching the 235 mark, but rather grant parole to as many as I could with confidence that they wouldn't negatively impact the community.
-
-
Replying to @SF_Shoobie @netfire4 and
I'd respect DPH and their 600 inmates maximum recommendation but at the end of the day if I didn't have confidence that the community wouldn't be negatively impacted then there is no grounds for parole. Full stop.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SF_Shoobie @michelletandler and
Were currently in the position of the dph that holding them poses greater societal rick than releasing them. This agrees with guidance from throughout our judicial system.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.