I remain hesitant although open to this idea if those selected for release are not (1) violent or (2) repeat offenders who have demonstrated they need to be removed from the community.
I answered the question - 600 is a guideline estimate. We get as close as we can while remaining confident that those paroled won't negatively impact the [already struggling] community I also don't advocate for incarceration - status quo is unacceptable but I'm open to solutions
-
-
So I was asking, how would you prioritize the release of the additional 235, and you answered more people should be incarcerated than we have currently, how is that answering the question?https://twitter.com/netfire4/status/1341089659120545792 …
-
I think our communication is mixed up here. My point was to not get caught up on finding 235 inmates to parole, but rather form a baseline of confidence to apply to each inmate and parole as many as meet that bar while keeping confidence that this won't negatively impact society
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.