On that note - you're advocating for change here. I'm interested in hearing your ideas: how would you handle this specific individual if not jail? I'm all for helping those who demonstrate a desire to change, grow, and work hard to improve both themselves & their situations.
In this land the vast majority of us are able to live our lives without inhibiting happiness and success of our community. Happy to go lower than 600 if so many inmates are able to meet the aforementioned bar of confidence for parole and will be sent back to prison if they don't.
-
-
That wasn't the question, how might you prioritize releasing the remaining 28% of 835? Given that we may following medical guidance hold only 600, & there are many more that you regularly complain need incarcerated failing your standard of complying w incoherent excessive law.
-
I answered the question - 600 is a guideline estimate. We get as close as we can while remaining confident that those paroled won't negatively impact the [already struggling] community I also don't advocate for incarceration - status quo is unacceptable but I'm open to solutions
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.