There is no such thing as harmless quackery. There are only degrees of harm. People who ask “What’s the harm?” when defending certain bogus interventions are focused only on direct injuries. It’s more complicated than that.
-
-
Can't believe I missed that one. It had me in the first half thinking "I know but this isn't convincing anyone else", but it eloquently addresses questions I get whenever I try to push for science. Stellar article, even for
@gorskon.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.