Conversation

website considers charging for services users are outraged "but please don't mine our data like Facebook did", they say boy are we entitled

246

151

1,592

Replying to

I agree with you I'd say same for corporations who complain about free open-source software/libraries etc while never donating but earning millions But.... Will Twitter stop data mining & showing adds if we own a blue checkmark? They could charge me more if that's optional

SBF

@SBF_FTX

Replying to

@RNR_0

hm yeah good question

@elonmusk

how much would someone have to pay per month to get out of all other monetization/have their data be private/not see any ads?

10:23 PM · Nov 3, 2022Twitter Web App

Replying to

and

Replying to

and

Doing this would break their model. Twitter already pulls in some $5 bil annual revenue. That number is already rapidly decreasing, but Musk bought/leveraged at a price that requires him to *increase* it. Without selling user data, Twitter becomes a money pit.

Replying to

and

hey

, how much in truble is alameda after the recent rumours?

Replying to

God, people are really reading into this. Alameda has a billions of USD NAV.

Replying to

and

Lots less, because trying to monetize users via advertising and selling data is itself an a costly endeavor.

Replying to

and

How did you not even think about this initially?

Replying to

and

If it happens. Sign me up for incognito twtr. I ll pay the $resonable subs fee.

xrpbreezy FireGaryGensler

Replying to

and

Sam Bitlicense Fried

Replying to

and

That’s not interesting to advertisers, because it would mean they would never target the richer users (which in most cases is the most desired demographic).

Show replies