Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Replying to

and

yeah in retrospect I took a communication strategy that wasn't going to work: trying to find common ground on the strategic side, rather than just saying that I agreed philosophically but disagreed strategically

6:07 PM · Nov 1, 2022Twitter Web App

Replying to

and

Dude

0:11

161 views

Replying to

and

I think both you and Erik made good points, it’s just frustrating when ppl say they’re not being idealist when they clearly are

Replying to

and

heh maybe we'll be proven wrong and it'll turn out to be practical in DC...

Show replies

Replying to

and

You’re a pragmatist and a credit to the space

Replying to

and

Real talk I lost the debate. Voorhees dunked on me with easy-to-understand parallels e.g. using the history of email to draw valuable points. I slipped bro. Now I’m here: the reply guy

Replying to

and

Do you have a PR / comms advisor? Or is that discussed with a close group of friends/biz partners?

Replying to

and

I bet we can find common ground on the strategic side. Happy to discuss pragmatism all day, and it has its place. Licensure of interfaces for decentralized protocols is not among that common ground, and there is no quid pro quo from government than would justify it.