1) My *final* thoughts/post on this:
Conversation
3) At the end of the day I think I basically agree with and the industry on what's important and the right policy:
a) economic freedom
b) getting rid of discriminatory, classist standards for investment
c) freedom for DeFi
(putting aside effective strategy)
63
28
454
5) So I encourage everyone-- including --to make their voices heard and fight for what's right:
Fight for freedom, and to make the economy work, and for the exponentially interoperable power of DeFi.
11
25
344
Replying to
A big concern I have was Sam's strategy of coming to the table with negotiations on offer. That might work with a peer, but should not be the strategy for politically charged regulations where the overarching goal of your counterparty is control. No need to concede off the bat.
1
Replying to
I don't think that's what I was doing--I was coming with the strongest position I felt was plausible, but also in the background thinking about the endgame.
2
2
Replying to
I do see that was your motivation. But your talk about EV outcomes and worst case scenarios seemed to lead to a readiness to concede front end regs. Strikes me as too-soon negotiation. I worry if you see that as the strongest plausible position.
1
1
Replying to
Quote Tweet
8) One last thing:
I *am* seriously concerned that some relatively strident/adversarial strategies would end up backfiring and undermining DeFi.
I'm fine with CT leading the way--so for all our sakes I hope I'm wrong!
But I won't *actively* support things I think backfire.
Show this thread
The question we want to know is are you a good human? When choices arise, do you choose rightly? Drive us away from this corrupt existence, please. It takes strength to go against the current. If you can't to do what is right, stop...bc every action will make humanity worse.🙏
1
1
3
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Show