Conversation

Let's be really clear... My suggestion to Sam wasn't to take an absolutist, purist position. That's a strawman. My suggestion was highly pragmatic and prudent: don't include defi in a bill that intends to regulate BSA-registered financial intermediaries.
3
140
hm so I think you and I have fairly different priors on what would be interpreted in DC as 'absolutist' and 'purist' but idk maybe you're right! I'm guessing you've spent a bunch of time talking to lawmakers and regulators from both parties and gotten positive feedback?
9
34
Purist = free-market capitalism. No regulations of voluntary transactions between consenting adults. Anything less than that is already a compromise. I have no doubt a great many compromises will be in the DCCPA. Nobody should accept targeting defi as one of them.
5
177
don't think it does target DeFi, do you? If so, where/why? (Also what does 'targeting' mean?) I hear you on free markets! I think DC is more complex right now, but again, I'm probably just off-base here--how have your conversations with politicians gone?
13
45
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
good and bad are subjective, i don’t know how any of this is going to shape up but even as a web3 gaming studio founder i can tell you that the lack of regulatory framework is troublesome. the ideal path for us is one where you’re involved intimately, sam. it’s not binary.
2
15
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Show replies
I’m old enough to remember when one of the men pictured pushed an “everybody should own a home” bill that he thought was right which resulted in a very light and thin housing bubble that popped and caused a lot more harm than any good. That’s how regulation works. see: drugs etc
Image
1