as I clean my house :)
Takeaways:
- The Federal Reserve and banking system - highly regulated -- is not transparent. Why should crypto be held to a higher standard, when it is already MORE transparent in many ways?
Watched this earlier today, it seemed like a productive discourse
You can tell Erik has a stronger grasp, but showed deference to SBF in a “You gotta trust the person in the room” way
I never felt like SBF was lobbying on my behalf, but under Erik’s influence, I do feel better
I feel like Erik would blow an actual negotiation -- though I highly respect his thoughts and position.
I don't think an absolutist, purist position is possible here. If we gambled with that, we'd all get nothing.
SBF is practical. He's balancing many, many things.
yeah I mean tbh I have quite strong feelings about what would happen if you tried those lines in DC with regulators or (most) policymakers and they're probably in line with yours
but seems like a bunch of experts on crypto twitter disagree so who knows maybe they're right
That's what I was getting ...
SOMETHING is definitely going to happen here reg-wise.
And left to their own, lawmakers will be super overzealous and protect incumbents.
So we need to push hard but be willing to deal in some way.
Something will happen—either reasonable regulations get handed down or the US sees an EPIC brain drain and the largest off-shoring of innovation we’ve ever seen
Lawmakers and regulators can figure out how to do this correctly, w/ industry input, or they can lose fantastically
We still put our best foot forward, w/ our best arguments, articulated by our respected and politically savvy leaders
We need policymakers to see our best, and not just frogs, maxis screeching, and scams
They aren’t seeing the good we’re building, but they read about every hack
So the move is:
a) Push HARD for Hands Off DeFi. HARD.
b) Use the stick: "You fuck this up, USA, DeFi will STILL happen, but overseas. The next Apple, the next Google will be in Dubai. The world will route around USA like damage."
c) But deal if you have to. Protect validators
Negotiations don’t end at “no” — that’s where they begin
Erik’s point was that you start by stating your uncompromised position, then fight to achieve that. Compromise will be necessary, but if you start a negotiation by ceding some of our core philosophies, you’ve already lost