Conversation

I could be wrong, but i think this drives a big gap in their recommendations:

have very different *TIME FRAMES* they seek solutions by. SBF seeks near-term, immediately practical resolution. Voorhees has infinite runway to get this right. Thoughts?

Quote Tweet

Christian Limon

@cplimon

Oct 29

Highly recommend the full discussion bw @SBF_FTX & @ErikVoorhees. My prior was more/less aligned w SBF's on regulatory compromise, but Eric's analogies to the open internet & our responsibility to these liberties were very compelling. It's clear, we have more to think through twitter.com/BanklessHQ/sta…

Replying to

and

I think the alternative to imperfect regulation isn't no regulation. It's terrible regulation. That's what I'm concerned we'd end up with if we were not willing to work constructively in DC. Hopefully I'm wrong.

Replying to

and

That is very valid and fair to our circumstances. We help choose the imperfect we want or it's chosen for us, without our feedback.

Replying to

and

yup that's the worry

9:27 PM · Oct 29, 2022Twitter Web App

Replying to

and

🤔

Replying to

and

One point you make I think has legs, when a company/front-end actively *markets* to consumers. If spending a healthy budget & paying notable celebs / icons to gain the trust & attention of millions consumers at scale, I want to look closer at what they do.

Replying to

and

yeah tbh the thought that ^ won't ever be at all regulated is, uh, let's just say, 'a bit optimistic'

Show replies

Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content

Show