Conversation

2) NOT ADVICE

112

3) At the end of the day I think I basically agree with

@ErikVoorhees

and the industry on what's important and the right policy: a) economic freedom b) getting rid of discriminatory, classist standards for investment c) freedom for DeFi (putting aside effective strategy)

454

4) I don't always agree on the best strategy! But I might be wrong. And more important, it's not my decision to make--it's the community's. So: *I won't push against the community's strategy* even where I think it might not be the most effective way to accomplish the goal.

290

5) So I encourage everyone-- including

@ErikVoorhees

--to make their voices heard and fight for what's right: Fight for freedom, and to make the economy work, and for the exponentially interoperable power of DeFi.

344

6) I hope, for all our sakes, that the crypto twitter community has carefully considered all of the details of possible bills and policy proposals, and that the crypto twitter community correctly understands the details of policymaking and negotiation and alliances in DC.

270

7) There are a huge number of possibly paths here--some fairly subtle--and I worry that some people haven't fully thought out, empirically, what the result would be of possible decisions we could make. But hopefully I'm wrong about that. Crypto Twitter, take the wheel.

340

Replying to

Does this mean you are now opposing your push for the Digital assets standards that was previously published? Aka no longer supporting Digital Commodities Consumer Protection Act of 2022

5:07 PM · Oct 29, 2022Twitter Web App

Replying to

@Crypto_Core

those are all different things 'digital asset standards' was a blog post I wrote DCCPA is a bill the senate is writing and idk what 'opposing your push' means? what exactly are you asking?

Replying to

Apologies… a few blog posts that might’ve confused things for me. Prior you were advocating for DCCPA correct? So naturally I’m wondering if you are saying ftx and yourself will no longer support that bill being “written” by the senate

Replying to

er so: 1) depends on exactly language 2) we'll see what it turns out like 3) if I and community both agree, I'll fight for that 4) if we disagree, I'll quietly state my opinion but not fight for it

Show replies

Replying to

and

A foundation needs to be created to discuss these decisions, present them in a unified constructive manner. All decentralised projects should be represented and commit valuable time to the cause. Centralised crypto is an opt in but welcomed