1) My *final* thoughts/post on this:
Conversation
3) At the end of the day I think I basically agree with and the industry on what's important and the right policy:
a) economic freedom
b) getting rid of discriminatory, classist standards for investment
c) freedom for DeFi
(putting aside effective strategy)
63
28
454
5) So I encourage everyone-- including --to make their voices heard and fight for what's right:
Fight for freedom, and to make the economy work, and for the exponentially interoperable power of DeFi.
11
25
344
7) There are a huge number of possibly paths here--some fairly subtle--and I worry that some people haven't fully thought out, empirically, what the result would be of possible decisions we could make.
But hopefully I'm wrong about that.
Crypto Twitter, take the wheel.
Replying to
8) One last thing:
I *am* seriously concerned that some relatively strident/adversarial strategies would end up backfiring and undermining DeFi.
I'm fine with CT leading the way--so for all our sakes I hope I'm wrong!
But I won't *actively* support things I think backfire.
182
15
92
Replying to
Does this mean you are now opposing your push for the Digital assets standards that was previously published? Aka no longer supporting Digital Commodities Consumer Protection Act of 2022
1
7
Replying to
those are all different things
'digital asset standards' was a blog post I wrote
DCCPA is a bill the senate is writing
and idk what 'opposing your push' means?
what exactly are you asking?
2
11
Show replies
Replying to
SBF is just another grifter that forked an exchange. Nothing new created.
SBF is less innovative than the 8th fork of uniswap.
9
Show replies
Replying to
The fact that you steer institutions and market trends of great significance despite having so superficial a grasp over your own disconnect with empirical reality is, simply, embarrassing.
2
Replying to
I’m happy to take the wheel and go shake hands in DC but I need a few hundred million to throw around for some clout.
30







