Conversation

3) At the end of the day I think I basically agree with and the industry on what's important and the right policy: a) economic freedom b) getting rid of discriminatory, classist standards for investment c) freedom for DeFi (putting aside effective strategy)
63
454
Replying to
5) So I encourage everyone-- including --to make their voices heard and fight for what's right: Fight for freedom, and to make the economy work, and for the exponentially interoperable power of DeFi.
11
344
6) I hope, for all our sakes, that the crypto twitter community has carefully considered all of the details of possible bills and policy proposals, and that the crypto twitter community correctly understands the details of policymaking and negotiation and alliances in DC.
26
270
7) There are a huge number of possibly paths here--some fairly subtle--and I worry that some people haven't fully thought out, empirically, what the result would be of possible decisions we could make. But hopefully I'm wrong about that. Crypto Twitter, take the wheel.
61
340
8) One last thing: I *am* seriously concerned that some relatively strident/adversarial strategies would end up backfiring and undermining DeFi. I'm fine with CT leading the way--so for all our sakes I hope I'm wrong! But I won't *actively* support things I think backfire.
182
92
Show replies
Replying to
Oh good! You do agree with economic freedom! Glad you clarified that, because the whole community was starting to think that you don't really care about resisting censorship at all.
Replying to
Agreed. It’s super easy for everyone to be the reply guy here when you’ve obviously put in a tremendous amount of time and energy into constructing this V1. Important that the crypto community puts => effort into defending the space as we put into building it. 👍🏻
2
1