Conversation

the trick here is that he's citing FTX and Fidelity as examples of "centralized", but he also seemingly thinks any blockexplorer/JSON object generator is "centralized" if any aspect of it is hosted by anyone anywhere mere websites must not be regulated broker/dealers

Quote Tweet

SBF

@SBF_FTX

Oct 23

1) Whelp, that was an interesting few days. A retrospective.

Show this thread

191

_gabrielShapir0

@lex_node

Oct 23

etherscan must not be required to be registered as a broker dealer, merely because it "faciltiates" trades by displaying data & helping generate a JSON object same is true of more specialized block explorers that pertain to more limited data

128

Replying to

I highly doubt he thinks etherscan should be registered as a broker dealer, right

Replying to

and

you're correct!

Quote Tweet

SBF

@SBF_FTX

Oct 23

Replying to @lex_node

so if you look at the updated blog post (ftxpolicy.com/posts/possible) I actually call out etherscan explicitely as something that shouldn't count; thanks for pointing out that my prior language could have been read that way!

1:59 PM · Oct 23, 2022Twitter Web App

Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content

Show