Conversation

You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more

Replying to

100% advocating for crypto and defi it would be dumb, otherwise, for me to support a bill that regulated *my* business--increasing costs/etc.--while respecting DeFi (which is what I think/hope Stabenow-Boozman will do!). I'd love to hear your concrete proposals/disagreements!

Replying to

and

Your taint on this industry will be a hard one to wash off. Your business does not rely on *decentralised* crypto succeeding in the long run and your actions reflect that quite clearly.

Replying to

and

it 100% does depend on it, otherwise there would be no crypto to list on a centralized exchange

Replying to

and

You’re doing a great disservice to a decentralised future and a great disservice to the US if this bill passes If you’re in any way serious about caring about crypto and decentralisation, how about starting with removing your proposal to freeze assets on chain at the base layer.

Replying to

and

I definitely do not want to freeze assets at the base layer! Please actually read proposal: "Validators themselves purely have the goal of confirming that proposed blocks are in accordance with the rules of the blockchain, not separately parsing and policing regulatory content"

1:38 PM · Oct 21, 2022Twitter Web App

Replying to

and

I have no idea how that meme spread--it's not what I said and never what I said--but I do think that forcing blockchains to be permissioned would be really bad!

Replying to

and

Okay, (1) I appreciate you taking the time to reply. (2) I have read it out of context and I was referring to the ridiculousness of the requirement for decentralised *apps* (not base layer) to query the OFAC list. (3) Did ya’ll just change it?? Yesterday vs. today: