1) As promised:
My current thoughts on crypto regulation.
Conversation
Replying to
Hey I'd be honored if you'd read my response, and to know what you think of the conclusions.
3
14
76
Replying to
eh so I think I feel not very heard by you on blocklists?
like, I don't know how many times I wrote--both in my post and in my tweets--that I *don't* think it should mean that e.g. validators and blockchains are police, but my reading of your post implies that you think I did?
2
2
21
on OFAC -- idk man, I'm just restating the law here. You're welcome to (and in fact do!) state your opinions on what they law there should be, but that doesn't change what the law *is*.
5
2
18
on DeFi -- this is definitely the piece I'm least certain on.
I think the proposal I laid out is (a) better than the status quo and (b) better than we're likely to get.
But totally understand if you disagree with either of those, or otherwise think it's the wrong approach.
Replying to
I appreciate your answers.
Why do you believe it's "better than status quo"? Status quo doesn't require licensing of front-end websites.
3
24
he corruptly believes its “better than status quo.” reasonint is that it will drive more volume through FTX than defi protocols and make him richer.
AH, so basically you want to leech from people who believe in your cause and end up busting. But you gained their trust so you gained all their assets cause you told them some make-believe reality...? ah basic FTX
1
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Show