Conversation

Keeping DeFi and peer to peer transfers free is crucial. There are policies I honestly think are key to achieving that. I could be wrong about those policies--I probably am wrong about some! But in the end the most important thing is to keep commerce and expression free.

204

126

810

Thanks to everyone who gave feedback. At the very least, I'm going to update/edit to clarify that DeFi should not be censored.

2:20 AM · Oct 20, 2022Twitter Web App

Replying to

to be clear I never meant to imply that it should! It shouldn't. But allowing for the *ability* for DeFi to ultimately interface with regulated entities, when phrased poorly, could be read to imply a need to. And to be clear I don't think it should need to.

40

5

151

The Wall Street of Crypto

Replying to

correct!

329, 2259 StackChain

@ClydeCryptoDog

Replying to

If it shouldn’t be censored; building it on ETH seems like a flaw

1

2

Replying to

@ClydeCryptoDog

and

Tornado cash chugging along happily. Last tx included 7 minutes ago.

Tornado.Cash: Router | Address 0xd90e2f925da726b50c4ed8d0fb90ad053324f31b | Etherscan

The Contract Address 0xd90e2f925da726b50c4ed8d0fb90ad053324f31b page allows users to view the source code, transactions, balances, and analytics for the contract address. Users can also interact and...

3

Replying to

🫡🫡🫡

Replying to

DeFi should not have been censored in the first place.

1

19

Replying to

agreed, and I didn't mean to say it should. But what I said was definitely confusing on that point! h/t to a bunch of people who called that out.

3

1

12

Show replies

@lucyjoh81517512

Replying to

You could do better and give voyager customer 80-90%

1

Replying to

@lucyjoh81517512

and

He’s not running a charity. This coming as a Celsius user.