I disagree with the vast majority of this, may write a thread later.
Conversation
Replying to
would love to see it!
I def could be wrong on some of it.
But FWIW it's built on my sense of what the best realistic outcome is.
2
14
Replying to
I agree inasmuch as I expect it to be (at least similar to) the best realistic outcome.
1
15
Replying to
yup -- would love to see another proposal that you think is better and plausible!
2
8
Replying to
I think my biggest concern is the maintaining of a blocklist. I agree that the presumption ought always to be freedom of transaction, but the difference between an allowlist and a blocklist is on which side the majority falls.
There is no practical difference.
2
20
Replying to
I think there's a *huge* practical difference!
Right now, a *tiny* fraction of addresses are blocked, and also a tiny fraction are allowed. Blocklist vs allowed list is 99% of the spectrum.
Replying to
It still all boils down to "these people are allowed and these people are not, we are a centralized authority requiring adherence to our lists"
The number of entrants on either side of the list is not the point.
2
13
The government may choose to come enforce their list, post-event.
Not pre-event. That is the key differentiator which I am highly concerned about.
1
13
Show replies