Conversation

Replying to
5) Second, we need something to reduce the impact of security breaches and hacks in crypto. One way we could do that is with a community standard that required attackers to return the vast majority of assets and prioritize customer protection, in return for settling the dispute.
34
140
7) Fourth, we should develop a regulatory structure that allows the settlement benefits of blockchains to protect the profits made by retail investors in equities:
Quote Tweet
17) Ok, so how about market structure? On January 28th 2021, most major retail brokers shut down. Users were unable to buy; sometimes they were unable to sell, too. And on some platforms users got liquidated. The weird thing is that there was basically no leverage!
Show this thread
7
76
8) Fifth, we should develop standards to help inform and protect customers. At its core, I think this means: a) disclosures b) safer clearing models c) suitability based on knowledge, not wealth ftx.us/derivs/
10
80
9) Sixth, DeFi. This is, frankly, one of the trickiest areas to get right. The most important thing is that we not jump the gun: that industry, regulators, and lawmakers work collaboratively and thoughtfully together.
10
100
10) But we should make sure that code, peer to peer transfers, validators, etc. are free while also ensuring that retail-facing platforms and marketing build in customer protection.
9
81
12) All of these are just suggestions, and I would love feedback on them. It would be ideal if some industry group(s) took the lead in publishing what they felt were appropriate standards. And ultimately, we need sound regulatory frameworks.
18
81
13) I'm optimistic that we're making progress on that last point. I'm optimistic, for instance, that the Stabenow-Boozman bill would protect customers while also protecting economic freedom; and that federal regulators are making progress towards thoughtful frameworks.
8
72
14) But my support for any particular bill, framework, etc. is absolutely contingent on those points--contingent on them actually protecting customers, and them actually protecting economic freedom. Anyway, here's the blog post link once again: ftxpolicy.com/posts/possible.
93
102
Show replies
Replying to
Awfully coy considering the recent SEC investigations. Getting chummy publicly with what "they" want "us" to do epitomizes the self preservation action you/FTX Board do in face of market US reg risk. DeFi itself is other end of spectrum to reg CeFi - so natural to lobby against
3
Replying to
Hmm some red flag ELI5 - DeFi will be heavily monitored (worse UX) - algo stablecoins will be DOA - front end will be censorable Did I get it wrong? If not, I think the industry will fork into web2.5 (USA) vs web3 (rest of the world)
9