4) This can simultaneously enforce sanctions compliance effectively while also making sure that you don't need a passport and social security number to buy a bagel from 7-11.
Conversation
6) Third, we should work towards public disclosures and transparency for assets.
For non-securities, we have a framework we've rolled out for FTX US Derivatives: ftxus-legal.webflow.io/digital-assets.
11
14
87
7) Fourth, we should develop a regulatory structure that allows the settlement benefits of blockchains to protect the profits made by retail investors in equities:
Quote Tweet
7
6
76
8) Fifth, we should develop standards to help inform and protect customers.
At its core, I think this means:
a) disclosures
b) safer clearing models
c) suitability based on knowledge, not wealth
ftx.us/derivs/
10
10
80
11) Finally, stablecoins.
They make payments better: twitter.com/SBF_FTX/status.
We need regulatory oversight and up to date public information and audits to confirm that dollar backed stablecoins are, in fact, backed by the dollar.
ftxpolicy.com/posts/context-
15
7
107
14) But my support for any particular bill, framework, etc. is absolutely contingent on those points--contingent on them actually protecting customers, and them actually protecting economic freedom.
Anyway, here's the blog post link once again: ftxpolicy.com/posts/possible.
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Show replies
Replying to
Also if Chime doesn't need a banking license in traditional banking why would frontend defi applications need licenses? They are not holding users assets. Tbh it seems some of these regulations are more stringent then traditional finance
Show more replies




