1) As promised:
My current thoughts on crypto regulation.
Conversation
6) Third, we should work towards public disclosures and transparency for assets.
For non-securities, we have a framework we've rolled out for FTX US Derivatives: ftxus-legal.webflow.io/digital-assets.
11
14
87
7) Fourth, we should develop a regulatory structure that allows the settlement benefits of blockchains to protect the profits made by retail investors in equities:
Quote Tweet
7
6
76
8) Fifth, we should develop standards to help inform and protect customers.
At its core, I think this means:
a) disclosures
b) safer clearing models
c) suitability based on knowledge, not wealth
ftx.us/derivs/
11) Finally, stablecoins.
They make payments better: twitter.com/SBF_FTX/status.
We need regulatory oversight and up to date public information and audits to confirm that dollar backed stablecoins are, in fact, backed by the dollar.
ftxpolicy.com/posts/context-
15
7
107
14) But my support for any particular bill, framework, etc. is absolutely contingent on those points--contingent on them actually protecting customers, and them actually protecting economic freedom.
Anyway, here's the blog post link once again: ftxpolicy.com/posts/possible.
93
20
102
Replying to
How would you balance free economy principles and oversight?
Where is the line in the sand?
1
3

