Conversation

SBF
@SBF_FTX
Replying to
@SBF_FTX
3) Let's say that you have a margin trading protocol which allows cross-margin between a bunch of different assets. Your algorithm is "require 30% initial margin and 20% maintenance margin"--i.e. allow ~3x leverage, and margin call accounts if they get up to 5x leverage.
2
131
SBF
@SBF_FTX
4) You have an 'oracle' which reports the price of the assets, and your risk engine--the thing that calculates users' margin--uses prices from that oracle. One asset--say XYZ--has a price of roughly $0.40 according to the oracle. A user--Alice--has $200m XYZ and -$25m USD.
2
99
SBF
@SBF_FTX
5) Alice: 500m XYZ ~ $200m -25m USD = -$25m net value ~ $175m margin ~ 87.5% how much should the risk engine allow Alice to withdraw?
12
99
SBF
@SBF_FTX
6) A naïve answer would be "well if you require 30% margin then Alice can withdraw up to $115m; at that point her account would be: 500m XYZ ~ $200m -140m USD = -$140m net value ~ $60m margin ~ 30%"
1
64
SBF
@SBF_FTX
7) But there's a picture of a mango over The Oracle's face. So, obviously, XYZ is actually MNGO, and MNGO isn't really worth $0.40; it's worth around $0.04. Alice's real account value is, roughly: 500m XYZ ~ $20m -25m USD = -$25m net value ~ -$5m margin < 0 It's already gone.
3
86
SBF
@SBF_FTX
8) But for a brief period, someone (almost certainly Alice) bought enough MNGO that it did trade for $0.40, and before people could get in to sell and return it to a more reasonable price, the risk engine had already allowed Alice to withdraw $100m from Mango Markets.
2
102
SBF
@SBF_FTX
9) So, what went wrong? Did the oracle fuck up? I mean, not really. Or, rather, it depends on what the specs of the oracle were. The oracle accurate reported the current price of MNGO. It's just that the 'current price' wasn't really anything close to the 'fair price'.
3
147
SBF
@SBF_FTX
10) What should you really do? Well, let's look at what FTX does, and why *it* didn't have any risk engine issues.
3
99
SBF
@SBF_FTX
11) First, FTX has EWMA price bands. What this means is, roughly, that FTX consumes raw price feeds. But, before feeding that into its risk engine, it bounds those price feeds so that they can't move more than ~20% over a 5 minute period.
help.ftx.com
Order Limits and Price Bands
Order Limits Users can’t send orders that would move the price more than 2% (for futures markets) or 25% (for spot markets) through opposite side of the book. Orders too far through the book get ...
8
170
SBF
@SBF_FTX
12) The reason, basically, is: b) If an asset's price moves 3x in 1 minute, it's decently likely to be bad data, or a temporary wick, or something like that b) If the asset's price stays there for 5 hours, that new price is likely the true economic price
2
110
SBF
@SBF_FTX
Replying to
@SBF_FTX
14) Second, FTX uses 'IMF Factors'. The larger your position, the greater % margin we charge. For MNGO, the margin we charge is 0.00025 * sqrt(MNGO tokens). If you wanted to have a 500m MNGO position, FTX would have required, uh, 500%. (Bounded at 'fully funded'.)
2
127
SBF
@SBF_FTX
16) And some positions -- like the one in question -- are large and illiquid enough that the risk engine forces you to fully collateralize a position.
4
95
SBF
@SBF_FTX
17) So even before hitting position limits, the risk engine ensures that the collateral backing a position is sufficient. And what if you try to use something other than dollars as collateral? Well, we haircut it. In some cases, a lot.
help.ftx.com
Spot Margin Trading Explainer
  Overview With spot margin trading, users can trade with leverage and go short on spot markets by borrowing from other users (lenders) on FTX, who are looking to earn yield on their assets. Rates ...
4
102
SBF
@SBF_FTX
18) (It's worth noting that this is all referring to FTX International. In addition to all of the above protections, our amendment for FTX US Derivative's margin order would only be for BTC and ETH futures using USD margin. No MNGO, and certainly no MNGO collateral.)
6
103
SBF
@SBF_FTX
19) There are a bunch of other risk engine protections and sanity checks, too, which would have caught something like this. So -- back to the oracle. It reports: "MNGO: $0.40" Is it wrong?
7
103
SBF
@SBF_FTX
20) Well, it depends on what it's promising. But probably it's just promising to tell you, literally, what MNGO is currently trading at. And, for a brief period, on some exchanges, MNGO was in fact trading at $0.40. The real problem here was using the raw oracle price.
7
100
SBF
@SBF_FTX
21) The Oracle tells you everything and nothing--the history and current state of markets. It's the risk engine's job to consume that information, and decide what positions are safe. Sometimes it can't just regurgitate The Oracle. Sometimes it has to make up its own damn mind.
11
134
SBF
@SBF_FTX
22) Which doesn't mean that the risk engine needs to be manual. You can create a set of rules for it so that it's conservative, and handles apparent large moves gracefully. That, in the end, is probably the most important thing we do at FTX.
16
145
SBF
@SBF_FTX
23) And, really, it's why we started FTX in the first place. Tradfi had sophisticated (sometimes!), slow, manual risk models, and--in some FCMs--fast, egregious ones. Crypto had fast, automated, broken risk models. There was an opening for a thoughtfully automated risk engine.
71
354