Conversation

9) Ok, well, so, what's the *full* flow of funds here? Well... a) VCs invest in Meta b) VCs invest in $ X company P c) P sends $ X to Meta for advertising d) Customer S buys services from P, paying back $ X/2 e) P raises $ X/2 more from VCs f) Go back to step (c)
10
485
10) You might think that Meta, and Google, are making their money from customers, or from companies. And to some extent that's true!
3
259
11) But to some extent they're making money from VCs, because here's the *net* flow of funds: i) VCs: - $ X/2, + stock ii) Customers: - $ X/2, + some pizza iii) Companies: - stock, create pizza iv) Meta: + $ X
5
431
12) In other words: --Customers buy cheap pizza from companies --VCs send money to Meta --VCs get equity in companies
4
303
13) And what exactly do the companies get out of this? Well, one of the following, really: a) marketshare: future profit (???) b) founders get to sell out in secondaries c) you get to be 'a part of the future'
4
334
14) But it gets even weirder. Because who is Meta, exactly? Well, Zuckerberg, to some extent. But mostly, it's similar shareholders to the companies investing in it.
5
243
15) And so the flow of funds is, to some extent, really a cycle of funds.
Image
11
443
16) But how about VCs that *don't* get large dividends from Meta and Google?
Image
11
322
17) And who exactly are the ultimate investors? They're people, investing in stocks. Also, they're college endowments, and pension funds.
8
322
Replying to
19) That's kind of how modern finance works. It's also, for what it's worth, similar to how postmodern finance works:
Image
Quote Tweet
1) Between inflation and recession: Post-Modern Monetary Theory
Show this thread
122
916
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Show