Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Replying to

and

eh -- some truth but I think it's significantly off: 1) while JS has a bunch of EA-sympathetic people, it doesn't have nearly as many actual EAs 2) JS thinks--and I think I agree--that increasing market liquidity is on average pro-social

3:59 PM · Aug 1, 2022Twitter Web App

Replying to

and

And that liquidity ought to go to public good projects, not necessarily free but overall beneficial to most humans.

Replying to

and

And about the part of trading being a lottery managed by liquidity providers? 🧐

Replying to

and

Sam acquiring Voyager is imminent‼️😍

Replying to

i don’t think javascript is sympathetic to electronic arts

Replying to

and

How many vegans in jane street?

Replying to

and

Great ceo !

Replying to

and

does 2) depend on what assets are being traded? surely shitcoin liquidity does not have the same moral valence as, say, small business loan liquidity, or liquidity for total stock market indices that people put in their retirement funds?

Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content

Show