Conversation

Last year, the largest piece of negative feedback we got from VCs: our workforce wasn't growing exponentially enough. We had ~200 employees, they were expecting ~2,000. We told them additional employees added too quickly were net negative, and they could take it or leave it.
Quote Tweet
Time and again VCs and consultants told us we needed to hire faster, grow more quickly, and increase headcount. Through all of the pressure to do that @SBF argued that more headcount was unlikely to increase productivity and output.
Show this thread
157
1,457
We're at about 300 now, and growing, but sustainably--some come, some go, but we're increasing ~50% year over year. Maybe we'll get to 400 in the next year. But when it comes to hypergrowth, you can't replace 'growing revenue' with 'growing expenses'.
Image
Quote Tweet
1) Zig Zag and hiring: why FTX is going to keep growing as others cut jobs
Show this thread
53
472
Replying to
Quote Tweet
$CEL @SBF_FTX The risk engine messe up badly. UX was down, most traders unable to hedge, close, reduce their positions. The risk engine blocking traders. A bitmex style, people deserve refund that's not how exchanges are supposed to protect their customers
Show this thread
Image
5
Replying to
You stopped the opportunity to close short positions in the pair CEL-PERP After that you took the money of a huge number of people It was dirty.
2
6