Conversation

To be clear I also said that it _does_ have potential as a store of value. The BTC network can't sustain thousands/millions of TPS, although BTC can be xfered on lightning/L2s/etc.

Quote Tweet

Wu Blockchain

@WuBlockchain

May 16

FT: Sam Bankman-Fried, founder of FTX, said that Bitcoin has no future as a payments network because of its inefficiency and high environmental costs. Countries such as El Salvador and the Central African Republic have adopted Bitcoin as a legal tender. ft.com/content/02cad9

969

611

3,225

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

SBF

@SBF_FTX

Replying to

@0x_Messi

I didn't--they just chose my words very selectively :P

7:22 AM · May 16, 2022Twitter Web App

Replying to

and

the trick with media is to not say individual sentences you would not want to be quoted on.

291

Replying to

and

So "no comment" probably is best then

Show replies

Replying to

and

Hey

the problem is that anti crypto politicians are using the FT article for their won agenda to ban POW in EU for instance, look at that tweet from an EU MEP: twitter.com/AuroreLalucq/s

This Tweet is unavailable.

Replying to

and

That’s exactly what he wants his WEF overlords will be happy

Replying to

and

Hey Sam, then say the obvious & clear things up: "I have a vested interest in the success of Solana, it 'competes' with Bitcoin's lightning Network for immediate settlement." Whether you say it or not, EVERYONE is think this - and judging your character by NOT clarifying.

539

Replying to

and

Ftx continued to support Luna even though he knew it was unsustainable, and now this. I have growing questions about

@SBF_FTX

honesty. Seems disingenuous at best.

Show replies

Replying to

and

Solana lover talking his book

Replying to

and

Might be worth not doing too much news media interviews. If they don't represent your real opinion and 'Chose' what to say.

Replying to

and

you have a responsibility to control the narrative of pieces penned with your consent. use that consent and elaborate in the article L2 and lightening. it is an incredibly pejorative piece.

Replying to

and

Not mentioning lightening is just misdirection