Conversation

1) People suck at presenting results form a scientific study.
120
2,120
3) First, the highlight is that mask mandates decreased COVID in schools, P<0.001. Which, sure, it would be pretty weird if they didn't decrease COVID *at all*. But--everything's a tradeoff. How much impact do they have?
3
215
4) Well, there's not much discussion of that! Because the core focus is that there's a *statistically significant* result, rather than how *important* that result is. That's stupid. The more important question is how large the effect is, not how large the study was!
8
373
5) In this case, it seems like the mandates decreased COVID in schools by ~20 cases per 100,000 children per week. That's ~0.02%/week, or ~1%/year. Would you rather: a) wear a mask for 100 years b) get COVID once I'll let you judge how the benefits compare to the costs.
Image
21
572
Replying to and
Why focus only on 1 week out? The 2 week out data there is more relevant given time for exposure and incubation. Looks like that's about double so ~14%/year. (I still think school mask mandates should be lifting now)
1
1
Replying to and
It's significant on a larger, population wide, epidemiological level. Honestly, for a guy as supremely clever as you...🤦‍♂️You will find that most kids do not suffer a psychological crisis when wearing a mask. 😂