1) People suck at presenting results form a scientific study.
Conversation
3
4
168
10) Come on, guys.
*Anything* is statistically significant if your study has enough participants.
What matters is how large the effect is.
Replying to
I remember a German TV reporter multiple times verbally emphasizing that the infection incidence has gone up by over 90% within a week. Reporter nearly started screaming it lol. Then they briefly displayed the numbers and it had gone up from 20 to 38 points or something lmfao
1
7
Dunno if the US uses the same metric so I will add that 20 and 38 points is laughable low. We're currently at 1300 or something.
2
Replying to
Agree with the sentiment on scientific communication but not true about number of participants and statistical significance. Numbers will give more or less confidence in the significance, but can still be statistically significant with much smaller number of participants.
5
Replying to
Ok. It's not about the students it's about the transmission of the virus causing an overload of hospitals. More vaccination leads to less hospitalizations.









