I kind of feel like people shouldn't be able to public pieces like "The big question: is [x] true?" unless they have real information on whether or not [x] is true. Otherwise it just randomly sows doubt by implication.
Conversation
Replying to
I agree... But Tether shouldn't assert "[x] true" without real hard evidence either. Like an audit.
1
18
Those who accuse are the ones that should make evidence of what they are accusing, not the other way around.
2
4
Show replies
Replying to
I think journalist reputation is part of that policing. You post bad info, you lose credibility.
1
7
Show replies